Sweet vs. Salty
How did we calculate your result?
We added up the effect of your genetic variants at 43 places in your DNA (genetic markers) plus the effect of other factors, including your age and sex.
More about taste preferences
Genetics
We use one of two different methods to calculate your trait results.
Statistical Model
Most traits are influenced by many different factors, including genetics, lifestyle, and environment. Usually, a statistical model using many factors provides better predictions than looking at single factors by themselves. To develop our models, we first identify genetic markers associated with a trait using data from tens of thousands of 23andMe customers who have consented to research. Then, we use statistical methods to generate a "score" for that trait using your genotype at the relevant genetic markers as well as your age and sex. We predict your likelihood of having different versions of the trait based on the survey responses of 23andMe customers with similar scores. These predictions apply best to customers who are of the same ethnicity as the people whose data contributed to the model. The accuracy of these predictions varies from trait to trait.
Curated Model
For some traits, just a few genetic markers can strongly predict whether a person will have a particular version of the trait. For curated models, we first evaluate published scientific studies to identify genetic markers with well-established associations with the trait. Then, we look at genetic and survey data from tens of thousands of 23andMe customers who have consented to research. We estimate your likelihood of having different versions of the trait based on survey responses from customers who are genetically similar to you at those markers. These results apply best to customers who are of the same ethnicity as the people whose data contributed to the predictions.
About your Sweet vs. Salty result
Your result for this trait was calculated using a statistical model.
Bin # | Prefers salty | Prefers sweet |
---|---|---|
DA 1 | 70.56% | 29.44% |
2 | 66.30% | 33.70% |
3 | 63.65% | 36.35% |
4 | 62.38% | 37.62% |
5 | 60.60% | 39.40% |
6 | 60.17% | 39.83% |
7 | 59.49% | 40.51% |
8 | 58.22% | 41.78% |
9 | 57.60% | 42.40% |
10 | 57.21% | 42.79% |
11 | 55.99% | 44.01% |
12 | 53.65% | 46.35% |
13 | 53.93% | 46.07% |
14 | 51.75% | 48.25% |
15 | 50.90% | 49.10% |
16 | 50.17% | 49.83% |
17 | 49.32% | 50.68% |
18 | 48.41% | 51.59% |
19 | 44.16% | 55.84% |
20 | 41.45% | 58.55% |
Overall European | 55.80% | 44.20% |
References
- Berto S et al. (2016). "ELAVL2-regulated transcriptional and splicing networks in human neurons link neurodevelopment and autism." Hum Mol Genet. 25(12):2451-2464.
- Birch LL. (1999). "Development of food preferences." Annu Rev Nutr. 19:41-62.
- Fadool DA et al. (2004). "Kv1.3 channel gene-targeted deletion produces "Super-Smeller Mice" with altered glomeruli, interacting scaffolding proteins, and biophysics." Neuron. 41(3):389-404.
- Friedman LG et al. (2015). "Cadherin-8 expression, synaptic localization, and molecular control of neuronal form in prefrontal corticostriatal circuits." J Comp Neurol. 523(1):75-92.
- Keskitalo K et al. (2007). "Sweet taste preferences are partly genetically determined: identification of a trait locus on chromosome 16." Am J Clin Nutr. 86(1):55-63.
- Mennella JA et al. (2014). "Preferences for salty and sweet tastes are elevated and related to each other during childhood." PLoS One. 9(3):e92201.
- Oksenberg N et al. (2013). "Function and regulation of AUTS2, a gene implicated in autism and human evolution." PLoS Genet. 9(1):e1003221.
- Padoa-Schioppa C and Assad JA. (2006). "Neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex encode economic value." Nature. 441(7090):223-6.
- Padoa-Schioppa C and Assad JA. (2008). "The representation of economic value in the orbitofrontal cortex is invariant for changes of menu." Nat Neurosci. 11(1):95-102.
- Padoa-Schioppa C and Cai X. (2011). "The orbitofrontal cortex and the computation of subjective value: consolidated concepts and new perspectives." Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1239:130-7.
- Pers et al. (2015). "Biological interpretation of genome-wide association studies using predicted gene functions." Nat Commun. 6:5890.
- Simon SA et al. (2006). "The neural mechanisms of gustation: a distributed processing code." Nat Rev Neurosci. 7:890–901.
- Tucker K and Fadool DA. (2002). "Neurotrophin modulation of voltage-gated potassium channels in rat through TrkB receptors is time and sensory experience dependent." J Physiol. 542(Pt 2):413-29.